| |
| Author | Message | | | Posted on Sun May 22, 2005 11:09:30 | |
| | Again there seems to be a discrepancy in line 12 between the Latin and scanned text:
Latin:
nam inista prevalet nihil tacere.
Scanned:
nam ibi stat. pudet nihil tacere.
Perseus has something different again (see it here):
nam nil stupra valet, nihil, tacere.
| |  | | Bingley |
| | | Posted at Tue Nov 07, 2006 07:48:24 | Quote |
| | I have this as the preferred reading:
nam nil stupra valet, nihil tacere.
I don't have an apparatus criticus on me at the moment, but I'll check my library later to see what manuscripts say what.
Chris | |
|
|
|
|
