| |
| Author | Message | | | Posted on Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:07:53 | |
| | Why the "et" in Carmen 51.11? I've never seen it there before in any text I've used. Does it have any textual support? Is it an editorial fix to avoid the transferred epithet?
Jenny | |
| | | Posted at Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:39:51 | Quote |
| | | Yeah, it's not in my copy either, nor listed as a variant. | |
| | | Posted at Mon Mar 12, 2007 04:14:14 | Quote |
| | | I'm looking at a 18th century text (the 1772 Baskerville) and I don't see the "et" in line 11 either. | |
| | | Posted at Mon Mar 19, 2007 20:36:33 | Quote |
| | | Ok, I have removed the 'et' from line 11. But does then the scanning of Carmen 11 still make sense for line 11? | |  | Site manager  |
|
|
|
|
